Fascinating approach! Having ChatGPT argue with itself really highlights blind spots and refines ideas. Your breakdown of Optimist vs. Skeptic vs. Neutral Analyst makes the process so actionable.
I talk about latest AI trends and insights. Do check out my Substack, I am sure you’ll find it very relevant and relatable.
Haha! Yes, the evil twins, overthinking and procrastination. The idea is to reduce overwhelm and decision making but if it has the opposite effect, well, that's not good!
I have a love-hate with all of this stuff because part of me wants to automate all the tedious stuff away and part of me wants to control every piece of it. Note to self: just let go... 😊
Fascinating approach! Having ChatGPT argue with itself really highlights blind spots and refines ideas. Your breakdown of Optimist vs. Skeptic vs. Neutral Analyst makes the process so actionable.
I talk about latest AI trends and insights. Do check out my Substack, I am sure you’ll find it very relevant and relatable.
WOW I love this!! Of course you had to complicate things hahah. The 3-role structure is soooo much more useful than the 2-voice version.
Yes it is! I'm already thinking about other uses for this. I may create a custom GPT for it. We shall see.
Wow, this is fascinating! The benefits of adversarial prompting are pretty intuitively obvious.
But, whenever I try it, I end up overthinking and procrastinating. 🤣
Haha! Yes, the evil twins, overthinking and procrastination. The idea is to reduce overwhelm and decision making but if it has the opposite effect, well, that's not good!
I have a love-hate with all of this stuff because part of me wants to automate all the tedious stuff away and part of me wants to control every piece of it. Note to self: just let go... 😊
I can totally see that! For now, I’m sticking with what seems to work best for me…posting whatever pops into my head.😆
That seems to be working well for you, so keep on keeping on! 😊